Enovsys LLC v. Lyft, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ENOVSYS LLC, Case No. 23-cv-05157-EJD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING FIRST AND

SECOND MOTIONS FOR

10 v. RECONSIDERATION 11 LYFT, INC., Re: ECF Nos. 49, 53 Defendant. 12 13 This is a patent infringement case alleging that Lyft, Inc. infringed U.S. Patent Nos. 14 6,441,752 (“’752 patent”), 6,756,918 (“’918 patent”), and 7,199,726 (“’726 patent”) (collectively, 15 the “Asserted Patents”). The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Enovsys, LLC’s Second Motion for 16 Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration. ECF No. 53 (“Second Reconsideration Motion”). 17 Enovsys seeks reconsideration of the Court’s June 17, 2024 order granting Lyft’s motion to 18 dismiss, ECF No. 48 (“MTD Order”). Also pending is the portion of Enovsys’s First Motion for 19 Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 49 (“First Reconsideration Motion”), that 20 seeks an order clarifying the scope of the MTD Order. Having considered the…