(PS) Smith v. City of Sacramento
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PATRICIA LYNN SMITH and RASHID No. 2:24-cv-2268-DC-SCR
DESHAWN DEARY-SMITH,
12 Plaintiffs, 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. 14
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, COUNTY OF
15 SACRAMENTO, SCOTT JONES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Patricia Lynn Smith (“Smith”) and Rashid Deshawn Deary-Smith (“Deary- 19 Smith”) proceed pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with 20 Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs allege violations of their 21 constitutional rights stemming from Deary-Smith’s arrests and prosecutions and from other 22 actions taken by Sacramento County officials. Pending before the undersigned are motions to 23 dismiss filed by (1) Defendant City of Sacramento (“City”) (ECF No. 21); (2) Defendants County 24 of Sacramento (“County”), Deputy Scott Jones, Detective Elaine Stoops, Noah Louis Phillips, 25 Kelly Michael Jobe, Nicholas Bo Johnson, Anne Marie Schubert, Janice Hansen Scully, Jesse R. 26 Saucedo, District Attorney’s…