Justin

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MALIK M. JUSTIN, Case No. 25-cv-03714-LJC

8 Plaintiff,

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

9 v. TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

10 SHAWNTAE HARRIS-DUPART, Re: Dkt. No. 4 Defendant. 11

12 On April 30, 2025, the undersigned magistrate judge issued an Order to Show Cause why 13 pro se Plaintiff Malik Justin’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis should not be denied, and 14 why his Complaint should not be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) if he was able to 15 establish eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. That Order set a deadline of May 16 21, 2025 for Justin to respond, and advised Justin that the undersigned might recommend 17 dismissal for failure to prosecute if Justin did not file any response by that deadline. 18 That deadline has now passed, and Justin has not filed a response. Accordingly, the 19 undersigned recommends that the case be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute 20 and failure to comply with a court order, and…