(HC) Braggs v. Yolo County CWS

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20252:25-cv-00693California315 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON JAMES KALBERT No. 2:25-CV-0693-SCR

BRAGGS,

12 Petitioner, 13 ORDER AND v. 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

YOLO COUNTY CWS,

15 Respondent. 16

17 18 By order filed May 27, 2025, petitioner was ordered to show cause, within thirty days, 19 why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to provide a 20 change of address as required by local rules. ECF No. 4. The thirty-day period has now expired, 21 and petitioner has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a 23 district judge. 24 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 25 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty one days 28 after being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.