Deborah Cooney v. Molly Dwyer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 202523-15236California1,536 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DEBORAH COONEY, No. 23-15236

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-01721-YGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MOLLY C. DWYER, Clerk of Court, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Individually and in Her Official Capacity; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2025**

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges

Deborah Cooney (“Cooney”) appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Cooney’s motion for oral argument is denied. See Dkt. No. 68. dismissing her action against more than 140 defendants, including Molly Dwyer,

Susan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.