Frausto
Frausto v. Ndoh
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDGAR LOPEZ FRAUSTO, Case No. 19-cv-0544-BAS-LR
12 Petitioner,
ORDER
13 v. 1. VACATING APPLICATION
TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED
14 JANAN CAVAGNOLO, ROB BONTA, PETITION (ECF No. 18) 15 Respondents. 2. LIFTING STAY (ECF No. 9), 16 17 Plaintiff applies to this Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 (“Rule”) 15(c), for leave to file a First Amended Petition for write of habeas corpus by a 19 person in state custody. (ECF No. 18.) However, under Rule 15(a), a civil litigant may 20 “amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive 21 pleading is served.” Further, Rule 15 applies to habeas petitions “with the same force that 22 it applies to all garden-variety civil cases.” Calderon v. United States Dist. Ct., 134 F.3d 23 981, 986 n.6 (9th Cir. 1998) abrogated on other grounds by, Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 24 269 (2005)); see also Keating v. Hood, 191 F.3d 1053, 1067 (9th Cir. 1998)…