Lewis
Lewis v. Paramo
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN DEVERICK LEWIS, Case No.: 3:22-cv-0029-GPC-DEB
CDCR #J-49028
12
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
13 ESQUILIN’S UNOPPOSED Plaintiff,
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
14 vs. JUDGMENT 15
[Dkt. No. 72.] 16 DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, A. 17 HAMMETT, J. MENDEZ, R. BATTAD,
F. GRISEZ, R. ESQUILIN,
18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant R. Esquilin’s motion for summary judgment 22 filed on March 13, 2025. (Dkt. No. 72.) On March 18, 2025, a briefing schedule was 23 issued requiring Plaintiff to file an opposition by April 25, 2025. (Dkt. No. 74.) On the 24 same day, the Court also issued a Klingele/Rand Notice advising Plaintiff of Defendant's 25 motion for summary judgment and noting, “If you do not submit your own evidence in 26 opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary 27 judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.” (Dkt. No. 73.) 28 Despite the notice, Plaintiff did not file an…