Nifty Technologies, Inc. v. Mango Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NIFTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a New Case No.: 24-CV-194 JLS (AHG) York corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 14
MOTION TO DISMISS
MANGO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 15 PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED Delaware corporation, d/b/a CLICKUP,
COMPLAINT
16 Defendant. 17 (ECF No. 37) 18 19 Presently before the Court are Defendant Mango Technologies, Inc. d/b/a ClickUp’s 20 (“Defendant” or “ClickUp”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 21 (“Mot.,” ECF No. 37) and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support thereof 22 (“Mem.,” ECF No. 48). Plaintiff Nifty Technologies, Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “Nifty”) filed an 23 Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 49), and ClickUp filed a Reply (“Reply,” 24 ECF No. 50). Having carefully reviewed Nifty’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF 25 No. 26), the Parties’ arguments, and the law, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES 26 IN PART…