(PC) Maestas v. Office Department Appeals Corrections Board

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY MAESTAS, No. 1:23-cv-00668 KES GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 v. Doc. 9 14 OFFICE DEPARTMENT APPEALS

CORRECTION BOARD,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate 19 judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 5, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 21 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to 22 prosecute and failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address as required by Local Rule 23 183(b). Doc. 9. Specifically, the magistrate judge found that the relevant factors—that is, the 24 public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; the court’s need to manage its docket; the 25 risk of prejudice to the defendant; the public policy favoring…