Anna Fischer v. COMFRT LLC

I. INTRODUCTION

On February 24, 2025, plaintiff Anna Fischer, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (“plaintiff”), filed this class action complaint against defendants Comfrt, LLC (“Comfrt”) and Does 1-10 (collectively, “defendants”). Dkt. 1 (“Compl.”). On May 21, 2025, plaintiff filed the operative first amended complaint. Dkt. 21 (“FAC”). Plaintiff asserts three claims for relief: (1) violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200, et seq.; (2) violation of California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17500, et segq.: and (3) violation of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (““CLRA”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1750, et seg.’ Id.

1 Tt appears that the only difference between plaintiff's original complaint and plaintiffs FAC is that, in the original complaint, plaintiff only seeks injunctive relief under the CLRA. See Compl. § 85. The complaint also states that plaintiff has notified defendants “by separate letter” of the alleged CLRA violations and will amend the complaint to include compensatory and monetary damages if defendants fail to correct them. Id. The FAC, by…