Roshan

Roshan v. Lawrence

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20254:21-cv-01235California880 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PEYMAN ROSHAN, Case No. 21-cv-01235-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

9 v. INDICATIVE RULING

10 MELANIE J. LAWRENCE, et al., Re: ECF No. 229 Defendants. 11

12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Peyman Roshan’s motion for an indicative ruling regarding 14 relief from a judgment or order. ECF No. 229. The Court will deny the motion. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Because the facts are well-known to the parties and the Court has summarized Roshan’s 17 allegations in detail in its prior orders, ECF Nos. 56, 139, the Court will not repeat them in full 18 here. In sum, this closed case involves an action by Roshan, a California lawyer, challenging both 19 the State Bar Rules of Procedure and the internal rules and policies of the State Bar as 20 unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, among other claims. Roshan seeks 21 injunctive and declaratory relief against Defendant George Cardona, the current Chief Trial 22 Counsel of the State Bar of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.