(PC)Laguer
(PC)Laguer v. Arreola
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GEORGE A. LAGUER, No. 1:24-cv-00979-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DEFENDANTS’
13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED 14 H. ARREOLA, et al., (ECF No. 20)
15 Defendants.
16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s official capacity 20 claims, filed May 10, 2025. (ECF No. 20.) 21 I. 22 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 23 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s failure to protect claim against Defendants August 24 Vasquez, L. Pantoja, F. Correia, and John Does 1 through 3. 25 Defendants filed the instant motion to dismiss on May 10, 2025. Plaintiff did not file an 26 opposition and the time to do has passed. Local Rule 230(l). 27 /// 28 1 II. 2 …