Mario Mendoza v. Dehua Yu

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:25-cv-05540-MEMF-E 11 MARIO MENDOZA,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

14 STATE LAW CLAIMS

DEHUA YU D/B/A SMART CUTS; ANNA

15 MO KUEN LAM, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

16 ANNA MO KUEN LAM REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST; and DOES 1 to 10, 17 Defendants. 18

19

20 On June 18, 2025, Plaintiff Mario Mendoza (“Men doza”) filed a Complaint against 21 Defendants DEHUA YU D/B/A SMART CUTS (“Smart Cuts”); ANNA MO KUEN LAM, AS 22 TRUSTEE OF THE ANNA MO KUEN LAM REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST (“Anna”); and Does 23 1 to 10 (collectively, “Defendants”) asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an 24 alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a 25 claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 26 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the…