Beaudry

Beaudry v. The NOCO Company, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20254:25-cv-01467California3,696 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PETER BEAUDRY, Case No. 25-cv-01467-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO

10 THE NOCO COMPANY, INC., STAY DISCOVERY 11 Defendant. Re: ECF No. 6

12 13 Before the Court is Defendant The NOCO Company, Inc.’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 6. 14 The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. The Court will deny as moot NOCO’s 15 motion to stay discovery pending resolution of its motion to dismiss, ECF No. 31. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 For the purpose of deciding this motion, the Court accepts as true the following factual 18 allegations from the complaint, ECF No. 1-1. Defendant NOCO manufactures several models— 19 the GB20, GB40, GB50, GB70, and GB150—of products designed to jump-start dead vehicle 20 batteries (“the Products”). Id. ¶¶ 8–13. The Products are available for sale on NOCO’s website 21 and via online retailer Amazon, and NOCO is the “#1 Best…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.