Birkholz

Rovier Carrington v. Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20252:25-cv-05921California1,282 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

AMENDED CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-05921-JAK-MBK Date July 1, 2025 Title Rovier Carrington v. Warden Birkholz

Present: Hon. Michael B. Kaufman, U.S. Magistrate Judge

James Muñoz n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys for Petitioner: Attorneys for Respondent: n/a n/a

Proceedings: ORDER FOR PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HIS

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE

TO EXHAUST

1. This is a federal habeas corpus proceeding. On June 27, 2025, Petitioner, Rovier Carrington, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The filing fee is paid in full. Dkt. 1. Petitioner argues that the Bureau of Prisons has improperly calculated his time credits, which Petitioner contends he has earned under the First Step Act. Id. at 6. Petitioner requests the Court order the Bureau of Prisons to calculate Petitioner’s time credits and transfer him to community custody. Id. Petitioner argues that if his time credits were calculated accurately, he should be eligible for transfer to community…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.