(SS) Paduano v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20252:24-cv-01706California4,532 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HANNAH M. PADUANO, No. 2:24-cv-01706-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II 20 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401-34, and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under 21 Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. Plaintiff challenges 22 the “Step Five” determination of whether Defendant identified a significant number of jobs in the 23 national economy that she can perform. ECF No. 12 at 7. For the reasons that follow, the Court 24 will GRANT Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and DENY the Commissioner’s cross- 25 motion for summary judgment. 26 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 27 Plaintiff applied for DIB and SSI in July 2021 and January 2022,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.