Awakend

Awakend v. New U Life CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 3, 2025G063309California6,707 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 7/3/25 Awakend v. New U Life CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

AWAKEND, LLC, et al.,

Plaintiffs and Respondents, G063309

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022- 01298921)

NEW U LIFE CORPORATION

et al., OPINION

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Randell L. Wilkinson, Judge. (Retired judge of the Orange Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed. Rome, Eugene Rome, Brianna Dahlberg; Parsons Behle & Latimer and Erik A. Christiansen for Defendants and Appellants. Danelle Meoli, in pro. per.; Wellman & Warren, Scott Wellman and Chris…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.