Slaten
Slaten v. Christian Dior Perfumes, LLC.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ALEXIS SLATEN, Case No. 23-cv-00409-JSC
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT
9 v. COURT’S LIMITED REMAND TO
RULE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
10 CHRISTIAN DIOR PERFUMES, LLC., RECONSIDERATION 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 99
12 13 Plaintiff alleges Defendant Christian Dior Perfumes, LLC, deceptively labels and 14 advertises the sun protection factor (SPF) duration of certain of its cosmetic products in violation 15 of California law. (Dkt. No. 73.)1 The case is before the Court on the Ninth Circuit’s remand “for 16 the limited purpose of enabling the district court to rule on [Plaintiff’s] motion for 17 reconsideration.” (Dkt. No. 99.) Having considered the parties’ supplemental briefing on 18 Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. 19 A. Background 20 Plaintiff alleges Defendant’s Forever Foundation and Forever Skin Glow Foundation (the 21 “products”) create the false impression…