Tan
Tan v. Quick Box, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEANNE TAN, individually and on Case No.: 20cv1082-LL-DDL behalf of all others similarly situated, 12
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 v. GRANTING MOTIONS FOR FINAL 14
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
QUICK BOX, LLC, et al., 15 SETTLEMENTS [ECF Nos. 488, 492]; Defendants. 16
GRANTING MOTIONS FOR
17 __________________________________ ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS, AND
INCENTIVE AWARDS
18 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. [ECF Nos. 487, 489]; 19
DENYING AS MOOT SEALING
20 MOTION [ECF No. 494] 21
22 On June 12, 2020, Plaintiff Leanne Tan filed a putative consumer fraud class action 23 against Defendants La Pura, Quick Box, and Konnektive, alleged operators of an online 24 “free trial” scam. ECF No. 1. The First Amended Complaint is operative. ECF No. 89 25 (“FAC”); see ECF No. 299 (denying motion to further amend the complaint but noting 26 Konnektive’s post-suit name change on the docket). Plaintiff alleges that Defendants 27 fraudulently lured her and similarly situated consumers into…