Stelly

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAMANI COURVOISIER STELLY, Case No. 24-cv-06775-JSC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OF PARTIAL

9 v. DISMISSAL; OF SERVICE

10 SHIFFER, et al., Defendants. 11

12 Plaintiff, an inmate in the Martinez Detention Facility (“MDF”) proceeding without 13 representation by an attorney, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case was 14 assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathaniel E. Cousins, and Plaintiff consented to his jurisdiction. 15 (ECF No. 4.) Judge Cousins reviewed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and determined 16 that Plaintiff stated claims capable of judicial determination against Defendants Deputy Kapustin 17 and Deputy Shiffer for using excessive force. (ECF No. 7 at 2:20-21.) Judge Cousins concluded 18 Plaintiff’s remaining claims were not capable of judicial determination and granted Plaintiff leave 19 to file an amended complaint to correct the deficiencies in these claims. (Id. at 3-4.) After 20 Plaintiff filed a timely amended complaint (ECF…