Boose
Boose v. Musk
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELLIOT BOOSE, Case No. 25-cv-03366-AMO
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
9 v. DISMISS; QUASHING SERVICE OF
PROCESS
10 ELON MUSK, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 41 Defendants. 11
12 13 Plaintiff Elliot Boose, representing himself, initiated the above-captioned civil action. 14 Before the Court is Defendants Elon Musk and X Corporations’ motion to dismiss. To date, 15 Boose has not filed a response to Defendants’ motion. Because it concluded that a hearing was 16 unnecessary to resolve the motion, the Court vacated the hearing date. ECF 46; see also Civil 17 L.R. 7-1(b), Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b). Having read Defendants’ papers and carefully considered the 18 relevant legal authority, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss without 19 prejudice and QUASHES the service of process on Defendants. 20 Federal courts do not have jurisdiction over a defendant unless the defendant has been 21 served properly under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Jackson v.…