Trate

(HC) Papazian v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20251:24-cv-00851California1,605 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES PAPAZIAN, No. 1:24-cv-00851-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS AND DISMISSING PETITION

13 v. FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 14 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

WARDEN, USP-ATWATER, TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE

15 CASE Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 19 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The parties having consented to the exercise 20 of magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), the matter was reassigned to 21 the undersigned for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. (Docs. 6, 8, 9.) 22 On July 24, 2024, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. 1.) On 23 January 22, 2025, Respondent filed a motion to dismiss and response to the petition. (Doc. 18.) 24 Petitioner did not timely file an opposition to the motion. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.