Jorge Morales, Jr. v. County of Riverside
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 Nathan A. Oyster (SBN 225307) E-mail: noyster@bwslaw.com 2 Caylin W. Jones (SBN 327829) E-mail: cjones@bwslaw.com 3 Sydney M. Gronroos (SBN 345644) E-mail: sgronroos@bwslaw.com 4 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 444 South Flower Street, 40th Floor 5 Los Angeles, California 90071-2942 Tel: 213.236.0600 Fax: 213.236.2700 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE (also sued as
RIVERSIDE SHERIFF’S
8 DEPARTMENT), SHERIFF CHAD
BIANCO, DEPUTY BAKER, DEPUTY
9 MATHIS, and DEPUTY SIDIQUI
10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 JORGE MORALES, JR., Case No. 5:25-cv-1096-SP
14 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
15 v. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym 16 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a public entity; RIVERSIDE SHERIFF’S 17 DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF CHAD BIANCO, in his individual and official 18 capacities; DEPUTY BAKER;
DEPUTY MATHIS; DEPUTY
19 SIDIQUI; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21
22 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 23 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 24 proprietary, or private information for…