Doe

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20253:25-cv-01465California3,179 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No.: 25cv1465-LL (MSB)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX

13 v. PARTE APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO

SERVE A THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENA

14 JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address PRIOR TO A RULE 26(f) CONFERENCE 70.95.112.68, 15 [ECF NO. 4] Defendant. 16 17 18 On June 20, 2025, Plaintiff Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (“Strike 3”) filed an “Ex-Parte 19 Application for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference” 20 (“Ex Parte Application”). (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff seeks to subpoena Defendant John Doe’s 21 Internet Service Provider (“ISP”) Spectrum for “limited, immediate discovery . . . so that 22 Plaintiff may learn Defendant’s identity, further investigate Defendant’s role in the 23 infringement, and effectuate service.” (ECF No. 4-1 at 7.) Because Defendant has not 24 been identified, no opposition or reply briefs have been filed. For the following reasons, 25 the Ex Parte…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.