Kawasaki Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. Rorze Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20255:22-cv-04947California4,406 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAWASAKI JUKOGYO KABUSHIKI Case No. 22-cv-04947-PCP

KAISHA,

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 9 KAWASAKI’S MOTION TO STRIKE, v. GRANTING IN PART RORZE’S 10 MOTION TO EXCLUDE, GRANTING RORZE CORPORATION, et al., SEALING MOTIONS 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 211, 251, 252, 257, 258 12 13 This order addresses motions related to the opinions and reports of two expert witnesses. 14 Plaintiff Kawasaki moves to strike portions of expert Christian Tregillis’s report and defendant 15 Rorze seeks to exclude expert David Haas’s testimony. For the reasons stated herein, the Court 16 grants in part and denies in part both motions, and grants the related sealing motions. 17 I. Kawasaki’s motion to strike portions of Christian Tregillis’s expert report is granted in part. 18 19 Two months following the close of expert discovery in this case, Rorze served a 20 supplemental report from its damages expert, Christian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.