Theresa Miner v. L3Harris Maritime Power and Energy Solutions, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20258:25-cv-00676California5,018 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

THERESA MINER, Case No. SA CV 25-00676-DFM

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO REMAND AND

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT (Dkts. 11, 19)

L3HARRIS MARITIME POWER

AND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, Inc.,

Defendants.

Before the Court are two motions. The first motion before the Court is Plaintiff Theresa Miner’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. See Dkt. 11. Defendant L3Harris Maritime Power and Energy Solutions, Inc. (“L3Harris”) opposes the Motion to Remand. See Dkt. 12. Plaintiff filed a Reply in support of the Motion to Remand. See Dkt. 16. The second motion before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint (“Motion for Leave to Amend”). See Dkt. 19. L3Harris opposes the Motion for Leave to Amend. See Dkt. 20. Plaintiff filed a Reply in support of the Motion for Leave to Amend. See Dkt. 21. The Court finds these matters suitable for decision without oral argument and the July 8, 2025, hearing is VACATED. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand and Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.