Valentine

Valentine v. Granville Realty, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20251:25-cv-00798California3,473 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL VALENTINE, et. al. Case No. 1:25-cv-00798-KES-HBK 12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO

DENY APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN

13 v. FORMA PAUPERIS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

DENY PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR

14 GRANVILLE REALTY, INC, et. al. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER1 15 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 3, 4) 16 FOURTEEN DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 17 18 Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ applications to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 19 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Doc. Nos. 2, 3) and Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order 20 (Doc. No. 4, “Motion”). Plaintiffs’ complaint (Doc. No. 1), applications to proceed IFP, and 21 Motion were filed on July 1, 2025. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends 22 that Plaintiffs’ applications to proceed IFP and Motion be denied. 23 I. IFP 24 A. Legal Standard 25 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.