DMF Inc v. AMP Plus Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20252:18-cv-07090California9,750 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 O

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DMF, Inc., No. 2:18-cv-07090-CAS-GJSx 12 Plaintiff, [UNDER SEAL] RULING ON THE 13 – v. – PARTIES’ POST-JUDGMENT

MOTIONS [891, 901, 910, 920, 926, 927,

14 AMP Plus, Inc. d/b/a ELCO Lighting, 934, 938] and ELCO Lighting Inc., 15 [UNDER SEAL] Defendants. 16

17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 2 DMF, Inc. (“DMF” or “Plaintiff”) brought this patent infringement action against 3 AMP Plus, Inc. d/b/a ELCO LIGHTING and ELCO Lighting, Inc. (“ELCO” or 4 “Defendants,” generally, or “AMP Plus” and “ELI,” only when it is necessary to discuss 5 both entities separately) on August 15, 2018. Complaint, Docket No. 1. DMF alleged that 6 ELCO’s light emitting diode (“LED”) products infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,964,266 (the 7 “’266 Patent”). See id. ¶ 119. After a bench trial regarding infringement, damages, and 8 invalidity,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.