(PC) Abreu v. The Great State of California

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BLUE FIRE CLOUD ABREU, No. 2:24-cv-03358 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 THE GREAT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. Before the undersigned is plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1), motion to 19 proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2), request for full pardon (ECF No. 6), and motion to 20 consolidate cases (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds plaintiff’s 21 complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and recommends it be dismissed 22 without leave to amend. Because the complaint fails to state a claim, the court will exercise its 23 discretion to deny plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. See Tripati v. First Nat. 24 Bank & Tr., 821 F.2d 1368, 1370 (9th Cir. 1987) (“A district court may deny leave to proceed in 25 forma pauperis at the outset…