Suber

Suber v. Vvp Services LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 202524-1814California712 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN M. SUBER, No. 24-1814 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-02932-KK-AFM v.

MEMORANDUM*

VVP SERVICES LLC; VISION

VENTURE PARTNERS, LLC; ELEVEN

STONES, LP; AMIT

RAIZADA; PROMETHEUS VENTURES,

LLC; STRATTON SCLAVOS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Kenly Kiya Kato, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 10, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Karen M. Suber (“Suber”) appeals the district court’s orders (1) granting her

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). motion for voluntary dismissal and (2) denying her motion for relief pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1). We dismiss in part and affirm in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.