Whitworth

Whitworth v. Merrell CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2025G063210California4,565 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sanchez, J.

Filed 7/3/25 Whitworth v. Merrell CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JIM O. WHITWORTH,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063210

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2022- 01251868) JASON MERRELL et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Craig L. Griffin, Judge. Affirmed. Motion to strike portions of Appellant’s Appendix. Granted. Jim O. Whitworth, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Vivoli Saccuzzo and Jason P. Saccuzzo for Defendants and Respondents. * * * Plaintiff and Appellant Jim O. Whitworth is an attorney who represented Defendant and Respondent Jason Merrell in a lemon law action against Ford Motor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.