People v. Broadway CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2025H051144California7,863 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Trial Proceedings 1. Charges In July 1996, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a second amended information (information) charging Broadway, Williams, and two other codefendants (Cory Demond Holmes and Terence Demond Tyson) with crimes related to a shooting that occurred on or about January 27, 1996. Count 1 alleged that Broadway and his codefendants unlawfully and with malice aforethought attempted to kill Andre S.3 (§§ 187, 189, 664.) Count 1 also alleged that Broadway and his codefendants willfully, deliberately, and with premeditation attempted to murder Andre S. (§§ 187, 189, 664.) Counts 2 and 3 respectively alleged that Broadway and his codefendants assaulted Fred G. and Tiagmal B. with a handgun. (§ 245, subd. (a)(2).) Count 4 alleged that Williams (alone) permitted another person to discharge a handgun from his vehicle. (§ 12034, subd. (b).) The information additionally alleged, as to counts 1 through 3, that Broadway and his codefendants committed the offense for the benefit of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)) and while carrying a firearm in a vehicle (firearm carrying allegation) (§ 12021.5). Regarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.