Vasquez
(PC) Cortinas v. Vasquez
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, Case No. 1:19-cv-0367 JLT BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(B) AND
13 v. MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT 14 VASQUEZ, et al., (Docs. 180, 181) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Larry William Cortinas proceeded pro se in this action, in which he asserted violations of 18 his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court found Plaintiff failed to prosecute the 19 action and failed to obey the Court’s orders. (Docs. 173, 174.) Therefore, the Court dismissed 20 the action without prejudice and entered judgment on August 30, 2024. (Doc. 174.) Previously, 21 Plaintiff requested the Court reverse its decision and reopen the action. (Doc. 176.) The Court 22 construed the request as a motion for reconsideration under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of 23 Civil Procedure and denied the motion. (Doc. 179.) Plaintiff now again moves for relief under 24 Rule 60(b), and requests the Court set…