Baton
Baton v. Ledger SAS
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 EDWARD BATON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-02470-EMC
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING PARTIAL FINAL
9 v. JUDGMENT; CERTIFYING FOR
INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
10 LEDGER SAS, et al., 11 Defendants. Docket No. 170
12 13 14 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Final Judgment under Rule 54(b) as to (1) 15 the dismissed Defendants Shopify and TaskUs pursuant to Ledger’s forum-selection clause; and 16 (2) the dismissed CLRA claim against Ledger. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES 17 Plaintiffs’ Motion, and instead, CERTIFIES its prior orders at Docket Nos. 148 and 167, 18 specifically as to issue (1), whether Defendants Shopify and TaskUs may avail themselves of 19 Ledger’s forum-selection clause. 20 21 I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiffs are customers who purchased a Ledger SAS hardware wallet to protect their 23 cryptocurrency assets. Ledger’s hardware wallets store customer’s “private keys” for their crypto- 24 assets. …