Fred G. v. Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20252:22-cv-05710California8,500 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRED G., Case No. 2:22-cv-05710-FLA (Ex)

12 Plaintiff,

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

13 v. FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL

14

ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND

15 HEALTH INSURANCE CO., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 This action arises from the denial of a request for benefits under a tax-exempt, 2 multi-employer health plan (the “Plan”), governed by the Employee Retirement 3 Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”). Plaintiff Fred G. 4 (“Plaintiff”) brings claims against Defendant Director’s Guild of America-Producer 5 Health Plan (“Defendant” or “DGA”)1 for: (1) recovery of benefits due under an 6 ERISA benefit plan, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) (“§ 1132(a)(1)(B)”);2 and 7 (2) breach of fiduciary duty under § 1132(a)(3). Dkt. 13. 8 This matter came to bench trial on December 6, 2024.3 Dkt. 101. After 9 evaluating the evidence and considering the parties’ arguments, the court issues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.