Earl J. Washington v. Zackery William Wechsler

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20252:22-cv-06256California1,200 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARL J. WASHINGTON, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-06256-FLA (Ex)

12 Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

13 v. PLAINTIFF EARL J. WASHINGTON

SHOULD NOT BE DISQUALIFIED

14

FROM REPRESENTING PLAINTIFF

15 ZACKERY WECHSLER, et al., LOLA MITSUK 16 Defendants. 17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2 This action involves allegations that Defendants the City of Los Angeles, Los 3 Angeles Police Department, Zackery William Wechsler, Ronald Jacobus, III, Alfredo 4 Garcia, Johnny Alejandro Rios, Kirk Stuwart Anderson, Marcus Andrew Eggleston, 5 Allya Czarina Kahn, Jeffri Kent Norat, and Richard Angel Acosta (“Defendants”) 6 violated the constitutional rights of Plaintiffs Earl J. Washington (“Washington”) and 7 Lola Mitsuk (“Mitsuk”). The operative Complaint alleges federal claims under 42 8 U.S.C. § 1983 for unlawful search and seizure, excessive force, and false arrest, along 9 with related state claims. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.