Brightex Bio-Photonics, LLC v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20253:24-cv-07919California2,181 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

BRIGHTEX BIO-PHOTONICS, LLC,

7 Case No. 24-cv-07919-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 STAY PENDING INTER PARTES L'OREAL USA, INC., REVIEW 10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 52, 58 11

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Defendant L’Oreal USA, Inc. (“L’Oreal”) has filed a Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes 15 Review (“Motion”). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable for determination without oral 16 argument and therefore vacates the July 16, 2025 motion hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7- 17 1(b) and the Case Management Conference set for July 9, 2025. A Status Conference will be held 18 on December 10, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. The stipulation to change the motion hearing date is 19 DENIED as moot. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED.1 20 II. BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff Brightex Bio-Photonics, LLC (“Brightex”) filed this case on November 12, 2024, 22 accusing L’Oreal of infringing two patents,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.