Orajel
(PC) Frank v. Orajel
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KYLE FRANK, No. 1:22-cv-00638-KES-GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
13 v. Doc. 13 14 ORAJEL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 2, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 21 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to obey 22 court orders and failure to keep the Court apprised of his current address as required by Local 23 Rule 183(b). Doc. 13. Specifically, the magistrate judge found that the relevant factors—that is, 24 the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; the court’s need to manage its docket; 25 the risk of prejudice to the defendants; the public policy…