Poole

Poole v. Healthright 360

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20253:25-cv-03173California9,190 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DAWN POOLE, et al., 7 Case No. 25-cv-03173-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 9 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO HEALTHRIGHT 360, et al., DISMISS 10 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 14 11

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiffs filed this action in San Francisco Superior Court asserting wrongful death and 15 other state law claims against Healthright 360, Healthright 360 Foundation and Healthright 360 16 CEO Vitka Eisen, based on the death of their adult son resulting from a fentanyl overdose that 17 occurred while he was a resident in a treatment facility operated Healthright 360. Defendants 18 removed the action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Presently before the Court 19 is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”). A hearing on the Motion was held on June 25, 20 2025. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.1 21 II. BACKGROUND 22 A. Allegations in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.