King

King v. Clear and Strategic LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20253:25-cv-00508California510 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KRIS KING, Case No. 25-cv-00508-MMA-DEB

11 Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING

12 v. COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULE 83.3(j) 13 CLEAR AND STRATEGIC LLC, 14 Defendant. [Doc. No. 5] 15 16 On March 5, 2025, Plaintiff Kris King filed his Complaint. Doc. No. 1. On June 17 30, 2025, Jermaine McNeil appeared to file an Answer to the Complaint on behalf of 18 Defendant Clear and Strategic LLC (“Clear and Strategic”). Doc. No. 5. 19 Under Civil Local Rule 83.3(j), only individuals may appear in court without 20 counsel. Business entities, including limited liability companies, must be represented by 21 an attorney admitted to practice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 83.3. See id. (“Only natural 22 persons representing their individual interests in propria persona may appear in court 23 without representation by an attorney permitted to practice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 24 83.3. All other parties, including corporations, partnerships and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.