Lastorina-Snyder
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIO LASTORINA-SNYDER, Case No. 25-cv-03732-TLT
8 Petitioner,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v. 9
10 PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. 11
12 13 Petitioner, who is detained at Elmwood Correctional Facility in Santa Clara County, has 14 filed a pro se petition for writ of corpus, and several amended petitions. The most recent amended 15 petition is in front of the Court for screening. Dkt. No. 15. Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed 16 in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 9) is denied as moot because he has paid the $5.00 filing fee. See Dkt. 17 No. 7. Respondent will be ordered to show cause why the petition should not be granted. 18 LEGAL STANDARD 19 This court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in 20 custody pursuant to the judgment of a state court only on the ground that he is in custody in 21 violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose v. 22 Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). If a person is not…