Martinez

Martinez v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20251:24-cv-00027California2,242 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARITA MARTINEZ, No. 1:24-CV-00027-KES-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND 13 v. Doc. 11 14 JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware Limited 15 Liability Company, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff Clarita Martinez (“Martinez”) filed this case in Fresno County Superior Court 19 alleging that defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (“JLRNA”) violated multiple 20 provisions of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“Song-Beverly Act”), Cal. Civ. Code 21 §§ 1790–1795.8 (West 1970). JLRNA removed the action to this court based on diversity 22 jurisdiction. Doc. 1 (“Notice of Removal”). Martinez filed the pending motion to remand. 23 Doc. 11. For the reasons stated below, Martinez’s motion to remand is denied. 24 I. Background 25 On October 12, 2023, following her purchase of a 2020 Jaguar F-Type vehicle, Martinez 26 filed this “lemon law” action against JLRNA in Fresno County Superior Court. Doc. 1-2 27 (“Compl.”). Martinez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.