Huupe
Henderson v. Huupe
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUKAS HENDERSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00046-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
13 v. ACTION 14 HUUPE, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION
15 Defendant. (Doc. 6) 16
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
17 18 19 Plaintiff Lukas Henderson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated 20 this civil action on January 10, 2024. (Doc. 1.) On June 4, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s 21 complaint and granted him leave to amend. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed 22 on July 1, 2025, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 6.) 23 I. Screening Requirement and Standard 24 The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma 25 pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 26 dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to…