Alicia Wright v. E. Ricolcol

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20255:24-cv-01863California897 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. Introduction and Relevant Procedural History

22 Before the court is the Magistrate Judge’s June 3, 2025, Report and 23 Recommendation. (Dkt. 22 (“Report and Recommendation” or “R&R”).) Based on 24 the state of the record, as applied to the applicable law, the court ADOPTS the Report 25 and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge, including each of the findings 26 of fact and conclusions of law therein. 27 28 1 In summary, on August 2, 2024, Petitioner Joseph Robert Ward (“Plaintiff”) filed

2 a Petition for a Writ Of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C § 2241. (Dkt. 1 (“Petition”).)

3 On December 6, 2024, Respondent E. Ricolcol, Warden of the Satellite Prison Camp in

4 Victorville, California, of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“Respondent”), filed a

5 Motion to Dismiss the Petition. (Dkt. 15 (“Motion to Dismiss”).) On January 13,

6 2025, Petitioner filed an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. 18

7 (“Opposition”).) On June 3, 2025, the Magistrate Judge issued the Report and

8 Recommendation. (Dkt. 22) On June 20, 2025, Petitioner objected to the Report and

9 Recommendation. (Dkt. 23 (“Objections”).)

10 II. Discussion 11 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.