(SS)Widick
(SS)Widick v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON CHRISTOPHER WIDICK, Case No. 1:25-cv-00406-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND
13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL REMANDING CASE1
SECURITY,
15 (Doc. No. 13) Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed July 7, 2025. (Doc. 19 No. 12). Plaintiff Aaron Christopher Widick and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that 20 this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 21 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). 22 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 23 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 24 See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under 25 the Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating…