Corveloo
(HC) Bolanos v. Corveloo
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 CARLOS ALFONSO BOLANOS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00585-KES-EPG-HC
12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE
TO AMEND
13 v.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
14 PATRICK CORVELOO,
TO SEND PETITIONER BLANK § 2254
15 Respondent. FORMS
16 17 Petitioner Carlos Alfonso Bolanos is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 I. 20 DISCUSSION 21 The Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“Habeas Rules”) require preliminary review 22 of a habeas petition and allow a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is 23 ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that 24 the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 25 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. 26 Habeas Rule 2(c) states that a petition must “(1) specify all the grounds for relief 27 …