Corveloo

(HC) Bolanos v. Corveloo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20251:25-cv-00585California446 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CARLOS ALFONSO BOLANOS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00585-KES-EPG-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE

TO AMEND

13 v.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

14 PATRICK CORVELOO,

TO SEND PETITIONER BLANK § 2254

15 Respondent. FORMS

16 17 Petitioner Carlos Alfonso Bolanos is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for 18 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 I. 20 DISCUSSION 21 The Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (“Habeas Rules”) require preliminary review 22 of a habeas petition and allow a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is 23 ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that 24 the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 25 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. 26 Habeas Rule 2(c) states that a petition must “(1) specify all the grounds for relief 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.