Lacewell

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NAVDEEP SANDHU,

12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-01842-TLN-JDP 13 v. 14 ANDREW LACEWELL, ORDER 15 Defendant,

16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Andrew Lacewell’s (“Defendant”) Notice of 18 Removal and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) For the reasons set forth 19 below, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis as moot and 20 REMANDS the action to the Superior Court of California, County of Solano due to lack of 21 subject matter jurisdiction. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 On June 13, 2025, Plaintiff Navdeep Sandhu (“Plaintiff”) brought an action for unlawful 3 detainer against Defendant for possession of real property located at 264 Bridgewater Circle, 4 Suisun City, California, 94585 (the “Property”). (ECF No. 1 at 8.) On July 1, 2025, Defendant 5 filed a Notice of Removal (“Notice”) removing this unlawful detainer action from the Solano 6 …