Bondi
Arteaga Martinez v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OSCAR ISAIN ARTEAGA MARTINEZ, No. 23-3414 Agency No. Petitioner, A073-906-844 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 8, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Oscar Isain Arteaga-Martinez (“Arteaga”) petitions for review of a Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reopen proceedings
after the BIA dismissed his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his
applications for adjustment of status and waiver of inadmissibility. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition.