Fuentes-Bautista

Fuentes-Bautista v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202524-1309California1,084 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YUSLI CLARISA FUENTES- No. 24-1309 BAUTISTA; A.E. FUENTES-BAUTISTA, Agency Nos.

A220-297-488

Petitioners, A220-297-487 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 7, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.

Yusli Fuentes-Bautista and her minor child (collectively, “petitioners”)

appeal the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to

reopen removal proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel for failure

to file an opening brief before the BIA. Petitioners argue that the BIA abused its

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. discretion by demanding strict compliance with the requirements articulated in

Matter of Lozada, 19 I. & N.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.