Bermudez-Ayala

Bermudez-Ayala v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 8, 202524-1033California1,028 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HEIDI BRENDALY BERMUDEZ- No. 24-1033 AYALA; EDRIC RUBIO-BERMUDEZ, Agency Nos.

A220-146-640

Petitioners, A220-146-641 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 7, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, DESAI, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge CALLAHAN.

Heidi Brendaly Bermudez Ayala (“Ayala”) and her son (collectively,

“petitioners”) petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

denial of her motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel for failure

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. to file an opening brief before the BIA.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

We deny the petition.

We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion.

Kaur v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.